We use Hartsock's standpoint theory to argue that a key reason for the
intractability of the abortion debate is that it is framed in the ter
ms of the standpoint of economically privileged, white men. Drawing on
a range of feminist analyses of how gender, class, and race structure
consciousness, we first identify key parameters of the dominant stand
point. Then we show how they are expressed in pro-life and pro-choice
discourse by identifying; four themes which recur on both sides of the
debate: (1) a narrow construction of reproduction; (2) a reliance on
logical dichotomy and decontextualized abstraction; (3) a tendency to
construct justifications using an individualistic language of rights;
and (4) an orientation to domination and confrontation. We suggest tha
t alternative standpoints offer a way out of the current perceptual an
d political deadlock.