BACKGROUND. Recent data from clinical trials suggest that quality-of-l
ife (QOL) measurements may independently predict survival. The relatio
n between survival and QOL measurements was tested among 122 inpatient
s and 96 outpatients with malignancies at one of four sites (colon, br
east, ovary, or prostate) who participated in a cross-sectional valida
tion study of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), a measure
of the frequency of, severity of, and distress caused by physical symp
toms. METHODS. The relation between MSAS summary scores and survival w
as evaluated in a multivariate analysis that adjusted concurrently for
other important covariates, such as age, site and extent of disease,
inpatient status, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and other QOL me
asurements. RESULTS. In the multivariate analysis, extent of disease (
P < 0.0001), inpatient status (P = 0.014), higher MSAS physical sympto
m subscale score (P = 0.004), and lower KPS score (P = 0.009) independ
ently predicted decreased survival. Other QOL measurements did not con
tribute significantly to the model. CONCLUSIONS, The MSAS physical sym
ptom subscale score significantly predicts survival and adds to the pr
ognostic information provided by KPS and extent of disease. Patients m
ay be under-assessed regarding both the number and the severity of sym
ptoms. Measurements of physical symptoms and related distress offer ad
ditional prognostic information concerning the survival of patients wi
th cancer and may account for the predictive value of QOL scores. (C)
1998 American Cancer Society.