COMPARISON OF SPIRAPRIL, ISRADIPINE, OR COMBINATION IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY - EFFECTS ON LVH REGRESSION AND ARRHYTHMOGENIC PROPENSITY
Aj. Manolis et al., COMPARISON OF SPIRAPRIL, ISRADIPINE, OR COMBINATION IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY - EFFECTS ON LVH REGRESSION AND ARRHYTHMOGENIC PROPENSITY, American journal of hypertension, 11(6), 1998, pp. 640-648
This study was designed to evaluate in 45 hypertensive patients with l
eft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) the effects of a 6-month course with
one of three different antihypertensive regimens (the calcium channel
blocker isradipine, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor spira
pril in monotherapy, or a combination of the two drugs, n = 15 per gro
up) on blood pressure, LVH regression, and various functional correlat
es of LVH. All three treatment modalities decreased significantly LV m
ass index by an average of 10%, although the combination had the great
est blood pressure-lowering effect and spirapril had the least, as ass
essed by office resting pressures, ambulatory monitoring; and isometri
c grip testing. There was no correlation between magnitude of blood pr
essure lowering and degree of LVH regression. The effects of treatment
on presser hormone profiles differed among groups, as spirapril tende
d to suppress angiotensin II and norepinephrine, whereas isradipine ha
d opposite effects. Exercise tolerance was prolonged by all three regi
mens, but significantly more by the combination. All three regimens de
creased significantly the double product by 10% to 15%. Indices of ele
ctrophysiologic stability calculated from analysis of ambulatory elect
rocardiogram exhibited significant improvement in several parameters s
uch as QRS duration, presence of late potentials, and measures of hear
t rate variability, resulting in fewer episodes of simple or complex v
entricular arrhythmia. We conclude that all three regimens produce sig
nificant LVH regression associated with improved functional capacity a
nd electrical stability. These results reflect the sum of the differen
tial hemodynamic and hormonal effects exerted by each treatment modali
ty. (C) 1998 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.