The environmental impact of agricultural production is generally recog
nised to be negative as a function of a wide range of externalities in
cluding land and soil degradation, water loss and quality deterioratio
n, deforestation and biodiversity loss. Thus, the impact of trade libe
ralisation in the context of subsidised and uncompetitive Nordic agric
ulture should mean environmental improvement. However, further reducti
on of the agricultural sector can generate a range of additional exter
nal costs. Ironically, where agriculture was once subsidised for one c
lass of public goods relating to income enhancement - it might now be
supported for environmental public goods. The new class of benefits re
late to open space and scenic values, heritage and recreation values,
biodiversity conservation and ecological food production. In this sett
ing the key distinction is of agriculture producing environmental amen
ity rather than food or fibre.