AUTOMATED PROTEIN-SEQUENCE DATABASE CLASSIFICATION - I - INTEGRATION OF COMPOSITIONAL SIMILARITY SEARCH, LOCAL SIMILARITY SEARCH, AND MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT
J. Gracy et P. Argos, AUTOMATED PROTEIN-SEQUENCE DATABASE CLASSIFICATION - I - INTEGRATION OF COMPOSITIONAL SIMILARITY SEARCH, LOCAL SIMILARITY SEARCH, AND MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT, BIOINFORMATICS, 14(2), 1998, pp. 164-173
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications","Biology Miscellaneous","Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications","Biochemical Research Methods
Motivation: Genome sequencing projects require the periodic applicatio
n of analysis tools that can classify and multiply align related prote
in sequence domains. Full automation of this task requires an efficien
t integration of similarity and alignment techniques. Results: We have
developed a fully automated process that classifies entire protein se
quence databases, resulting in alignment of the homologous sequences.
The successive steps of the procedure ar-e based on compositional and
local sequence similarity searches followed by multiple sequence align
ments. Global similarities are detected from the pairwise comparison o
f amino acid and dipeptide compositions of each protein. After the eli
mination of all but one sequence from each detected cluster of closely
related proteins, the remaining sequences are compiled in a suffix tl
ee which is self-compared to detect local sequence similarities. Sets
of proteins which share similar sequence segments are then weighted a
ccording to their closeness and multiply aligned using a fast hierarch
ical dynamic programming algorithm. Computational strategies were devi
sed to minimize computer processing time and memory space requirements
. The accuracy of the sequence classifications has been evaluated for
12 462 primary structures distributed over 341 known families. The per
centage of sequences with missed or incorrect family assignments was 6
.8% on the test set. This low en or level is only twice that of the ma
nually constructed PROSITE database (3.4%) and is substantially better
than that found for the automatically built PRODOM database (34.9%).