Background A battery of tests has been developed to better define the
variety of defects which can occur in the process of visual perception
of motion. Methods The tests assessed the perception of 1) coherent m
otion, in each of the four cardinal directions; (2) form from motion;
(3) flow in depth; and (4) motion of a target moving in depth, within
or without an optic flow surround. A normative study was conducted wit
h 34 subjects, 21 to 69 years of age. Results Recognition of form from
motion was better with upwards than with downwards motion. Perception
of motion in depth was better with backward than forwards motion. The
presence of an optic flow altered the perception of a motion in depth
. Conclusion The recognition of form from motion demonstrated an asymm
etry in threshold between the upward and downward movements. This asym
metry did not occur with global coherent motion, thus reflecting the v
ariety of mechanisms involved in the visual process of motion. Moreove
r, alteration of perception of motion in depth within an optic flow re
flected background effect.