DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ANTHURIUM CULTIVARS TO BACTERIAL-BLIGHT IN FOLIAR AND SYSTEMIC INFECTION PHASES

Citation
H. Fukui et al., DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ANTHURIUM CULTIVARS TO BACTERIAL-BLIGHT IN FOLIAR AND SYSTEMIC INFECTION PHASES, Plant disease, 82(7), 1998, pp. 800-806
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01912917
Volume
82
Issue
7
Year of publication
1998
Pages
800 - 806
Database
ISI
SICI code
0191-2917(1998)82:7<800:DSOACT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Susceptibility of anthurium cultivars to systemic infection by the bac terial blight pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. dieffenbachiae, was examined using a bioengineered bioluminescent strain (V108LRUH1) and compared with susceptibility to foliar infection. Eight cultivars with different levels of susceptibility to foliar infection were evaluated for their susceptibility to systemic infection. Petioles of second yo ungest leaves cut near the main stem were inoculated with strain V10LR UH1, and subsequent movement of this bacterium into other petioles was monitored by observing bioluminescence from the plants. The actual ex tent of systemic movement was determined by reisolating V108LRUH1 from dissected segments of the remaining petioles. In susceptible cultivar s, the pathogen advanced very rapidly and nearly reached the distal en d of petioles. In resistant cultivars, the pathogen was detected in no ne (or very few) of the petiole segments. However, the susceptibility ranking among the tested cultivars for systemic infection did not alwa ys correspond to the ranking determined for foliar infection: i.e., on e cultivar that was susceptible to foliar infection was highly resista nt to systemic infection, and vice versa. This suggests that cultivar susceptibility of anthuriums to bacterial blight may differ depending on the phase of disease progression, and thus evaluation for both dise ase phases is essential for complete understanding of cultivar suscept ibility.