Preclinical studies are consistent with the concept that 41.8 degrees
C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) can enhance the therapeutic index of a
ntineoplastic agents. These laboratory investigations resulted in four
phase I/II clinical studies, which also support this hypothesis. Thes
e studies were extended to sin phase II and one phase III investigatio
ns of WBH plus ifosfamide. carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for patient
s with metastatic and/or refractory sarcoma, ovary cancer, breast canc
er, non-small cell lung cancer. head and neck cancer and malignant mel
anoma. Only patients (14-65 fears of age) with (h)istologically confir
med advanced cancer beyond hope for surgical cure or metastatic diseas
e have been treated. AU patients hal-e had a projected life expectancy
of at least 12 weeks and a WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 1. WBH (
41.8 degrees C for 60 min) with ICE chemotherapy IFO (5 g/m(2)), CBDCA
(300 mg/m(2)) and VP-16 (given with WBH, as well as day 2 and 3 post
WBH at 100 mg/m(2)) was given every 3 weeks. All patients received fil
grastim post ICE/WBH. nle response rates in our multi-institutional tr
ials remain quilt high at approximate to 40% (refractory sarcoma). res
pectively approximate to 60% (de-novo-/metastatic sarcoma). The degree
of bone marrow toxicity seen with radiant heat WBH/ICE vs. ICE alone
is essentially identical. On average. 50% of patients exhibit grade II
I/IV anemia; 90% experienced grade III/IV neutropenia or thrombocytope
nia. No cardiopulmonary toxicity has been observed. The former problem
of renal toxicity has been essentially eliminated. Taken collectively
the laboratory and clinical investigations of the member institutions
of the Systemic Hyperthermia Oncological Working Group (SHOW Group) h
ave evolved a potentially new and therapeutically sound therapy for ma
lignant sarcoma and other solid tumors.