The appeal of Friedman's (1996) zero-nominal-interest-rate policy deri
ves from the simplicity of the argument and the relative ease with whi
ch it could be implemented. This paper shows, however, that there are
likely many monetary policies (and inflation rates) consistent with a
zero nominal interest rate, and social welfare varies across these pol
icies. The main implication is that one ought to be careful in selecti
ng a monetary policy to implement Friedman's proposal. This point is i
llustrated in a model in which the Friedman Rule is desirable but the
optimal monetary policy is different from that which is typically attr
ibuted to Friedman's proposal.