C. Smithramirez et al., FLOWERING, FRUITING AND SEED-GERMINATION IN CHILEAN RAIN-FOREST MYRTACEAE - ECOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS, Plant ecology, 136(2), 1998, pp. 119-131
Phenological studies in plant communities have generally focused on ta
xonomically heterogeneous species assemblages, and have only occasiona
lly examined the evolutionary and ecological constraints on the phenol
ogical patterns of species within a single family or a genus. Here, we
determine relative importance of phylogenetic versus other constraint
s on the flowering and fruiting periods of 12 species and the germinat
ion ecology of 10 species of Myrtaceae sympatric to the temperate rain
forest of Isla Grande de Chiloe (42 degrees 30' S), in southern Chile.
We found that, for most species in the family Myrtaceae, flowering wa
s strongly aggregated in January and February. Although this pattern i
s consistent with the expectation of the 'facilitation' hypothesis (i.
e., interspecific overlaps are maximized to attract pollinators), avai
lable evidence suggests that pollinators, mainly hymenopterans and dip
terans, do not limit fruit production in these species of Myrtaceae in
the temperate rainforest. In contrast to flowering, fruiting occurred
all-year-round, showing greater segregation in time among the species
. According to the their temporal patterns of fruit ripening, two func
tional groups were defined within the Myrtaceae: those that ripen thei
r fruits immediately after flowering (species in the subtribe Myrtinae
) and those in which green fruit develops slowly for several months be
fore ripening (subtribe Myrciinae). Seed germination in the field occu
rred mainly between August and October. Lab assays showed that the spe
cies of Myrtaceae, subtribe Myrtinae, exhibited a long seed dormancy (
>40 days), while the seeds of species in the subtribe Myrciinae often
germinated within one week after harvesting. The analysis of the pheno
logy of reproductive events in the species of Myrtaceae in this rainfo
rest suggests that: (1) flowering periods patterns are constrained mai
nly by phylogenetic inertia at the family level, and (2) differences i
n fruiting patterns and dormancy periods are determined mainly by frui
t and seed size, which in turn are associated primarily with phylogene
tic closeness within the family, and secondarily with the activity of
vertebrate seed dispersers.