PREDICTION OF POST-REVASCULARIZATION FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY OF ASYNERGICMYOCARDIUM USING QUANTITATIVE TL-201 REST-REDISTRIBUTION TOMOGRAPHY -HAS THE REVERSE REDISTRIBUTION PATTERN AN INDEPENDENT SIGNIFICANCE
R. Sciagra et al., PREDICTION OF POST-REVASCULARIZATION FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY OF ASYNERGICMYOCARDIUM USING QUANTITATIVE TL-201 REST-REDISTRIBUTION TOMOGRAPHY -HAS THE REVERSE REDISTRIBUTION PATTERN AN INDEPENDENT SIGNIFICANCE, European journal of nuclear medicine, 25(6), 1998, pp. 594-600
The significance of reverse redistribution on rest-redistribution thal
lium-201 myocardial scintigraphy is unclear. Previous studies suggeste
d that reverse redistribution segments with normal resting activity in
clude viable myocardium? whilst resting defects with further worsening
correspond to scar. We evaluated whether reverse redistribution has a
n independent significance for the prediction of post-revascularizatio
n recovery, particularly as compared with the quantification of redist
ribution activity. We studied 26 coronary artery disease patients with
left ventricular dysfunction, who underwent Tl-201 rest-redistributio
n single-photon emission tomography (SPET) and echocardiography before
revascularization, Viability was defined by the detection of wall mot
ion improvement on follow-up echocardiography. Tl-201 activity was con
sidered normal if greater than or equal to 80%, moderately reduced if
<80% but greater than or equal to 50%, and severely decreased if <50%.
Reverse redistribution was defined as a defect in redistribution imag
es with greater than or equal to 10% decrease in relative Tl-201 activ
ity compared with the resting value. Reverse redistribution was detect
ed in 33 segments (10%). Baseline dysfunction was equally observed in
the reverse re distribution and in the non-reverse redistribution segm
ents (64% vs 56%, P=0.40) and the rate of asynergic segments with post
-revascularization recovery was not different between the two groups (
33% vs 54%. P=0.11). The rate of functional recovery in redistribution
defects without reverse redistribution was 53% in moderate and 30% in
severe defects: the corresponding values for the reverse redistributi
on segments were 50% and 27% (all non-significant versus non-reverse r
edistribution seg mints), For the prediction of post-revascularization
recovery in asynergic segments, the detection of reverse redistributi
on on rest-redistribution Tl-201 SPET does not add any information to
the quantitative analysis of redistribution activity.