HIGH VERSUS LOW CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN SIMULATION-BASED TRAINING OF TROUBLESHOOTING SKILLS - EFFECTS ON TRANSFER PERFORMANCE AND INVESTED MENTAL EFFORT
Mbm. Decroock et al., HIGH VERSUS LOW CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN SIMULATION-BASED TRAINING OF TROUBLESHOOTING SKILLS - EFFECTS ON TRANSFER PERFORMANCE AND INVESTED MENTAL EFFORT, Computers in human behavior, 14(2), 1998, pp. 249-267
The effects of contextual interference on practice behavior, transfer
performance, and cognitive load for learning troubleshooting skills we
re studied A low contextual interference (LCl) condition, in which sub
jects practiced to diagnose system failures in a blocked schedule, was
compared with a high contextual interference (HCl) condition, in whic
h failures were practiced in a random schedule. The following hypothes
es are stated Hypothesis I: during practice, subjects in the HCl group
will require more time to reach a high performance level (i.e., more
accurate and/or faster diagnoses of system failures) on practice probl
ems and will have to invest more mental effort relative to subjects in
the LCl group. Hypothesis 2: subjects in the HCl group will show high
er performance and lower invested mental effort on far transfer test p
roblems, relative to subjects in the LCl group, but there will be no d
ifference between the groups on near transfer test problems. The resul
ts showed that subjects in the HCl group were more accurate in diagnos
ing far transfer problems, although during practice they needed more t
ime to diagnose system failures and made significantly more incorrect
diagnoses. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.