As the economic reform began in the early '90s, so did a fundamental r
estructuring of the entire pension system. The goal of this restructur
ing was to establish a pension system that: - met the needs of a marke
t economy; - encouraged individuals, as well as social groups, to take
responsibility for themselves and their social independence; - compli
ed with international conventions, and met the requirements for coordi
nating pension insurance systems. A significant aspect of this reform
is reducing people dependence on the state, this dependence was excess
ive during the former previous regime. A critique of the applicable le
gal provision in 1990 showed significant defects - the negative influe
nce of the pension insurance level would have a strong impact during t
he transition period. The goal of the penision insurance reform was to
remove such deficiencies. This was, however, possible only by impleme
nting fundamental changes that on the one hand brought about a number
of improvements, but also imposed certain limitations necessary to mai
ntain reasonable pension costs. The transformation process between 199
0 and 1996 established the pension system, based on two pillars: - The
obligatory pension insurance based on the principle of social solidar
ity. Its funding is pay-as-you-go (no fund is created, pensions are pa
id within the particular period directly from premiums from people). -
Voluntary state-contributory supplementary pension insurance that is
taken as individual saving, and is fully funded. This article explains
the main changes and their consequences during 1990 - 1996, analyses
the main shortcoming of the present pension system, and suggests same
possible trends.