Gp. Joshi et al., WORK OF BREATHING IN ANESTHETIZED PATIENTS - LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY VERSUS TRACHEAL TUBE, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 10(4), 1998, pp. 268-271
Study Objective: To compare the work of breathing associated with the
laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and tracheal tube (TT) in spontaneously br
eathing anesthetized patients. Design: Randomized, prospective, contro
led trial. Setting: University teaching hospital, Subjects: 20 ASA phy
sical status I and II patients scheduled for elective peripheral surge
ry with general anesthesia. Interventions and Measurements: Al standar
dized anesthetic protocol was utilized and patients were allowed to br
eathe spontaneously through a circle absorption system. Patients were
randomly assigned to receive either LMA (n = 10) or TT (n = 10) for ai
rway management. Work of breathing was determined after the patients'
ventilatory status had been allowed to stabilize for 15 minutes and be
fore the onset of the surgical stimulus. Airflow and esophageal pressu
res were measured using a pneumotachograph and an esophageal balloon,
respectively, and the values were subsequently integrated to determine
work of breathing. Main Results: The two groups were similar with res
pect to demographic characteristics and the end-tidal concentrations o
f carbon dioxide and isoflurane. Work of breathing per minute through
the LMA (1.4 +/-0.3 J/min) was significantly lower than that through t
he TT (1.9 +/- 0.4 J/min). Conclusion: In healthly, anesthetized spont
aneously breathing patients, work of breathing is significantly lower
through the LMA than the TT. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.