M. Morgan et al., QUALITY OF MIDWIFERY LED CARE - ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT MODELS OF CONTINUITY FOR WOMENS SATISFACTION, Quality in health care, 7(2), 1998, pp. 77-82
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Health Care Sciences & Services
Background-Changing Childbirth (1993), a report on the future of mater
nity services in the United Kingdom, endorsed the development of a pri
marily community based midwifery led service for normal pregnancy, wit
h priority given to the provision of ''woman centred care''. This has
led to the development of local schemes emphasising continuity of midw
ifery care and increased choice and control for women. Aims-To compare
two models of midwifery group practices (shared caseload and personal
caseload) in terms of: (a) the extent to which women see the same mid
wife antenatally and know the delivery midwife, and (b) women's prefer
ences for continuity and satisfaction with their care. Methods-A revie
w of maternity case notes and survey of a cohort of women at 36 weeks
of gestation and 2 weeks postpartum who attended the two midwifery gro
up practices. Questionnaires were completed by 247 women antenatally (
72% response) and 222 (68%) postnatally. Outcome measures were the lev
el of continuity experienced during antenatal, intrapartum, and postna
tal care, women's preferences for continuity of carer, and ratings of
satisfaction with care. Results-The higher level of antenatal continui
ty of carer with personal caseload midwifery was associated with a low
er percentage having previously met their main delivery midwife (60% v
74%). Women's preferences for antenatal continuity were significantly
associated with their experiences. Postnatal rating of knowing the de
livery midwife as ''very important indeed'' was associated with both p
revious antenatal ratings of its importance, and women's actual experi
ences. Personal continuity of carer was not a clear predictor of women
's satisfaction with care. Of greater importance were women's expectat
ions, their relations with midwives, communication, and involvement in
decision making. Conclusions-Midwifery led schemes based on both shar
ed and personal caseloads are acceptable to women. More important dete
rminants of quality and women's satisfaction are the ethos of care emp
hasising friendliness and support, the consistency of care, good commu
nication, and participation in decisions.