DEVELOPMENT OF A SEMICONTINUOUS METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF NITRIC-ACID VAPOR AND PARTICULATE NITRATE AND SULFATE

Citation
Sm. Buhr et al., DEVELOPMENT OF A SEMICONTINUOUS METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF NITRIC-ACID VAPOR AND PARTICULATE NITRATE AND SULFATE, Atmospheric environment, 29(19), 1995, pp. 2609-2624
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13522310
Volume
29
Issue
19
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2609 - 2624
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-2310(1995)29:19<2609:DOASMF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
An automated method for the measurement of nitric acid vapor, particul ate nitrate, and particulate sulfate in the atmosphere has been develo ped. The method is based on a semi-continuous wet effluent denuder (WE D) and wet effluent frit (WEF) sampling system, followed by ion chroma tography with conductivity detection. The method provides separate mea sures of nitric acid and particulate nitrate, and is characterized by a sample frequency of 15 min and a detection limit of 10 pptv (parts p er trillion by volume) for each species. A variety of laboratory tests used to characterize the system performance are described. Among them the particle passing efficiency of the denuder was evaluated using NH 4NO3 particles (diameters < 1 mu m) generated by a new method. Ambient measurements using this method were compared with the Nylon and Teflo n filter pack method at three field sites: a loblolly pine forest in r ural Alabama; a suburban site in Boulder, CO; and a rural mountain sit e near Nederland, CO. The methods intercomparison was carried out at s ites with varying nitric acid mixing ratios, with the whole data set r anging from < 0.1 to 4 ppbv nitric acid. The nitric acid measurements collected using the WED method compared very well with the filter pack method (linear regression results: slope = 1.00 +/- 0.05, r = 0.97). Particulate nitrate and sulfate measurements were compared only in Ala bama. The particulate sulfate measured with the wet effluent frit and with the filter pack agreed within 12% on average. The particulate nit rate measured using the frit was much higher than that measured by the filter pack, and in addition, the WEF nitrate exhibited a strong diur nal variation while the filter pack nitrate did not. Principal compone nt analysis has been performed on the data set as a means to elucidate the cause of this difference, and to examine the atmospheric variabil ity observed during the Alabama study.