The movement for education reform is currently moving on two distinct
tracks. One emphasizes national policies, especially subject-area stan
dards. The other focuses on local control and experimentation through
restructuring and charters. This article examines some of the strength
s and weaknesses of each strategy and their consistency with one anoth
er: The suggestion here is that it is difficult to combine the contemp
orary rhetoric of national aims with the culture of belief-often found
in charter schools-that is crucial to local reform. A more realistic
view of reform would be less concerned with competitiveness or elabora
te standards and, within a looser structure that includes charter scho
ols, more concerned with basic skills and habits.