FIELDING STANDARDIZED PATIENTS IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS - LESSONS FROM A STUDY USING UNANNOUNCED STANDARDIZED PATIENTS TO ASSESS PREVENTIVECARE PRACTICES
Ja. Brown et al., FIELDING STANDARDIZED PATIENTS IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS - LESSONS FROM A STUDY USING UNANNOUNCED STANDARDIZED PATIENTS TO ASSESS PREVENTIVECARE PRACTICES, International journal for quality in health care, 10(3), 1998, pp. 199-206
Objectives. To document detection and suspicion rates of unannounced s
tandardized patients visiting community-based practices. Design. Prima
ry care physicians were recruited to participate in a study using stan
dardized patients. Four standardized patient scenarios were used. Sett
ing. Community-based primary care physicians' practices in southern On
tario between September 1994 and August 1995. Study participants. Sixt
y-two primary care physicians. Main outcome measures. A 'believability
' questionnaire completed after all four standardized patients had vis
ited the practices. Results. Of the primary care physicians approached
50% (62) agreed to participate. Twenty-one per cent of all visits wer
e suspected as standardized patient encounters. Forty-six per cent sus
pected one or more standardized patients. Only five physicians (8%) su
spected all four standardized patients. Reasons for suspecting standar
dized patients were associated with the characteristics of the physici
an's practices, the physician's practice profile and the standardized
patient cover story. Conclusion. The portrayal of asymptomatic patient
s seeking a new primary care physician presents unique challenges. Car
efully constructed cover stories, and detailed knowledge of the local
area and of the practices of the participating physicians is required
to allow standardized patients cases to be tailored to fit into primar
y care settings without arousing suspicion.