Aim-To evaluate PT derived fibrinogen determinations with reference to
the Clauss fibrinogen assay using a Sysmex CA-6000(TM) random access
coagulation analyser. Methods-Samples were analysed from normal subjec
ts (n = 20), patients with renal or liver dysfunction (n = 25), critic
ally ill patients (n = 25), patients receiving oral anticoagulant trea
tment (n = 50), and patients with a haemoglobinopathy (n = 127). Proth
rombin times were performed using two thromboplastins: one derived fro
m rabbit brain (Dade: Thromboplastin IS) and the other from recombinan
t human tissue factor (Dade: Innovin). Fibrinogen was assayed by the C
lauss method using a commercial kit (Dade: Fibrinogen). Results-The re
lation between Clauss fibrinogen and PT derived fibrinogen was found t
o be dependent on the patient's clinical group and source of the throm
boplastin used. When the data from the above sample groups were pooled
there was still a significant difference (p < 0.001) between Clauss f
ibrinogen and PT derived fibrinogen, irrespective of thromboplastin us
ed. Conclusions-It is unsafe to use the PT derived fibrinogen for pati
ent monitoring owing to non-uniform variability in response to clinica
l status and reagent employed; however, it may prove to be a useful sc
reening test in a research environment for estimating fibrinogen level
s among defined patient groups.