We present a new and much more efficient implementation of the proxima
l decomposition algorithm for routing in congested telecommunication n
etworks. The routing model that we analyze is a static one intended fo
r use as a subproblem in a network design context. After describing ou
r new implementation of the proximal decomposition algorithm and revie
wing the flow deviation algorithm, we compare the solution times for (
1) the original proximal decomposition algorithm, (2) our new implemen
tation of the proximal decomposition algorithm, and (3) the flow devia
tion algorithm. We report extensive computational comparisons of solut
ion times using actual and randomly generated networks. These results
show that our new proximal decomposition algorithm is substantially fa
ster than the earlier proximal decomposition algorithm in every case.
Our new proximal decomposition is also faster than the flow deviation
algorithm if the network is not too congested and a highly accurate so
lution is desired, such as one within 0.1% of optimality. For moderate
accuracy requirements, such as 1.0% optimality, and for congested net
works, the flow deviation algorithm is faster. More importantly, solut
ions that we obtained from the proximal decomposition algorithm always
involve flow on only a small number of routes between source-destinat
ion pairs. The flow deviation algorithm, however, can produce solution
s with flows on a very large number of different routes between indivi
dual source-destination pairs. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Networ
ks 31: 227-238, 1998.