Once the notion of a precursive relationship between developmental sta
ges is fully articulated in terms of the distinction between 'role' an
d 'realiser' states, it turns out that the 'Theory of Mind' literature
operates with a notion of precursive relationships described at too h
igh a level of abstraction to explain actual mechanisms of development
. Furthermore, the tendency within that literature to explain precursi
ve relationships in terms of role states with isomorphic linguistic/co
mputational structures is misleading. Developmental relationships are
more likely to exist between states which Flay a similar normative rol
e in the agents's psychology than between states which can be describe
d as sharing a similar computational architecture.