Some political theorists claim that a nationalism that acknowledges th
e authority of liberal moral principles can avoid the violent excesses
that have given nationalism a bad name. On this view, the cure for na
tionalist violence is not a rejection of nationalism in all its forms,
but the cultivation of liberal nationalism. Drawing on the insights o
f Hobbes and Locke on the sources of violent conflict, I argue instead
that any nationalism-liberal or otherwise-encourages the unjust use o
f violence. Nationalism is dangerous in any form because it cannot be
dissociated from certain attitudes that, even though not violent in th
emselves, still make violence more likely.