Segmented partisanship combines the traditional conceptualization of p
arty identification with the reality of different parties operating in
different locales. Using a sample of campaign contributors in Georgia
legislative elections, we analyze the importance of segmented partisa
nship by comparing the behavior and attitudes of segmented partisans t
o those with consistent party identifications. Segmented partisans are
generally less active and less ideologically extreme than their consi
stent counterparts, with the differences across the groups varying wit
h the salience of the appropriate state or national reference group. T
he net effect of segmented partisanship is to moderate the issue confl
ict between parties as some citizens seek the ''best fitting'' partisa
n identification.