AMISULPRIDE VERSUS FLUPENTIXOL IN SCHIZOPHRENIA WITH PREDOMINANTLY POSITIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY - A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED-STUDY COMPARING A SELECTIVE D-2-LIKE ANTAGONIST TO A MIXED D-1- D-2-LIKE ANTAGONIST/
H. Wetzel et al., AMISULPRIDE VERSUS FLUPENTIXOL IN SCHIZOPHRENIA WITH PREDOMINANTLY POSITIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY - A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED-STUDY COMPARING A SELECTIVE D-2-LIKE ANTAGONIST TO A MIXED D-1- D-2-LIKE ANTAGONIST/, Psychopharmacology, 137(3), 1998, pp. 223-232
The benzamide amisulpride (ASP) is a selective D-2-like dopamine antag
onist, while flupentixol (FPX), a thioxanthene, blocks D-2-like, D-1-l
ike and 5-HT2 receptors, To evaluate efficacy and safety of ASP and to
investigate the importance of an additional D1-like antagonism for an
tipsychotic effects and extrapyramidal tolerability, a randomized doub
le-blind multi- center study versus FPX as reference drug was performe
d for 6 weeks in 132 patients suffering from acute schizophrenia (DSM-
III-R) with predominant positive symptomatology. Doses were initially
fixed (ASP, 1000 mg/day; FPX: 25 mg/day) but could be reduced by 40% i
n case of side effects (mean daily doses: ASP, 956 mg; FPX: 22.6 mg).
Intention-to-treat evaluation demonstrated significant improvement und
er both medications. The difference between the mean BPRS decreases of
both treatment groups was 5.6 points (95% CI, 0.55,10.65) in favour o
f ASP. According to CGI, 62% of patients in either drug group were tre
atment responders. ANCOVA analysis showed that reductions of BPRS (ASP
: -42%; FPX, -32%) and SAPS (ASP, - 78 %; FPX: - 65 %) were more prono
unced under ASP Due to adverse events, significantly fewer ASP patient
s (6%) were withdrawn from the study (FPX: 18%). Extrapyramidal tolera
bility was better in the ASP group, as demonstrated by smaller increas
es in the Simpson-Angus Scale, the AIMS, and the Barnes Akathisia Scal
e in ANCOVA analyses with dosage as covariate. ASP appears to be as ef
fective as FPX with regard to antipsychotic effects on positive schizo
phrenic symptomatology, while extrapyramidal tolerability is better. T
hese conclusions have to be drawn cautiously, as dosage effects on out
come parameters cannot be entirely ruled out. The present results ques
tion the notion that additional blockade of D1-like receptors may be n
ecessary to achieve sufficient antipsychotic effects or to improve ext
rapyramidal tolerability.