This paper argues for a careful consideration of the methodological un
derpinnings of positive decision theory. Two state-of-the-art papers p
ublished in Econometrica, which support a variety of often contradicto
ry conclusions about the empirical validity of the expected utility mo
del, are used to motivate a discussion of what models might be for, an
d therefore what criteria should be used to determine their acceptance
or rejection. It is suggested that progress in positive decision theo
ry would be advanced if greater attention were given to causal structu
res and that this may, in turn, merit the use of simultaneous equation
techniques.