Over recent years, an extraordinary number of interpretations of Nietz
sche's work has appeared. I ask why he has become such an important fi
gure in contemporary political debate and whether any dominant concern
s can be elicited from the diverse readings of his texts. My response
to both questions is that because Nietzsche has been identified, by Ha
bermas among others. as the founding father of poststructuralism, this
is where debate between postmodernists and their critics is being sta
ged. I distinguish between recent philosophical and political interpre
tations but argue that in both cases, what is at stake are political q
uestions regarding authority, legitimacy and consensus. In the latter
part of the article I consider attempts at reconstructing a postmodern
politics out of Nietzschr's philosophy, but express some doubts about
such a project.