EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS IN OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST

Citation
J. Herlitz et al., EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS IN OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST, Resuscitation, 37(1), 1998, pp. 3-7
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
03009572
Volume
37
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
3 - 7
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-9572(1998)37:1<3:EWTUOA>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Aim: To describe the sequences of arrhythmias, number of shocks delive red and the number of failures in a consecutive series of patients wit h out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by our emergency medical ser vice (EMS) and in whom cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initia ted and in whom automated external defibrillators (AEDs) were used. Pa tients: All patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by t he EMS and in whom AEDs were used. Time for inclusion in the study: Ja nuary Ist, 1987 to December 31st, 1992. Results: In all there were 178 1 out of hospital cardiac arrests during the study period. Among them AEDs were used in 383 cases (22%). The total number of interpreted rhy thms delivered in these patients was 2719. Among all rhythm sequences coarse ventricular fibrillation (VF) was found on 375 occasions (14%); fine VF on 107 occasions (4%) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) on 12 occasions (0.4%). In ten cases with coarse VF (nine patients) the AED did not advise a shock (2.7%). In five of those nine patients a human error was interpreted as the explanation and in four there was a possi ble technical error. In these four patients defibrillation was delayed by 33-43 s, respectively. Among the 2225 rhythm sequences not judged as VF/VT the AED advised a shock on one occasion (0.04%). Conclusion: Among patients with coarse VF AED gave inaccurate instructions in 2.7% . However, the majority of the failures were judged to be caused by hu man errors. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved .