Mr. Gismondo et al., INTERFERENCE ON HELICOBACTER-PYLORI GROWTH AND ADHESION BY OMEPRAZOLEAND OTHER DRUGS, Journal of chemotherapy, 10(3), 1998, pp. 225-230
Helicobacter pylori Is the causative agent of gastritis and a co-agent
in other gastroduodenal diseases. Gastroduodenal ulcer and MALT-lymph
oma in particular, regress when patients are administered antimicrobia
l agents to eradicate infection. Sometimes eradication is not definiti
ve and is difficult to check. The aim of our study was to test the ant
imicrobial activity of omeprazole on H. pylori in comparison with ampi
cillin and other anti-H, drugs (ranitidine and famotidine), and to eva
luate their interference with bacterial adhesion of H. pylori. We also
compared results of the agar dilution antibacterial sensitivity test
on H. pylori to those obtained using a bacteria adherence to cell mono
layers model, to see if drug activity was different against adhered ba
cteria. We evaluated omeprazole and ampicillin MIC90s (minimum inhibit
ory concentrations) against 20 H. pylori isolates by traditional agar
dilution method and by exposing previously adhered bacteria to an Hep-
2 monolayer to different drug concentrations. The activity. against ba
cteria adhered to cell lines was evaluated by counting viable adhered
bacteria after 1, 6, 12 hours of contact with drug. Interference with
adherence to Hep-2 cells was also tested. Omeprazole and ampicillin MI
Cs were comparable to other findings (omeprazole MIC90 was 12.5 mu g/m
l and ampicillin MIC90 was 0.016 mu g/ml), while higher concentrations
were necessary (4 x MIC90) against adhered bacteria. These findings s
uggest that MICs evaluated with traditional assays can have different
predictivity than tests on adhered H. pylori.