Ap. Colombo et al., SERUM ANTIBODIES REACTING WITH SUBGINGIVAL SPECIES IN REFRACTORY PERIODONTITIS SUBJECTS, Journal of clinical periodontology, 25(7), 1998, pp. 596-604
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the levels of serum I
gG antibody to 85 subgingival species in 32 refractory periodontitis,
56 successfully treated, and 33 periodontally healthy subjects. Refrac
tory subjects showed mean full mouth attachment loss and/or >3 sites s
howing attachment loss >2.5 mm within 1 year after 2 treatment modalit
ies, scaling and root planing and surgery plus systemically administer
ed tetracycline. Successfully-treated subjects showed mean attachment
level gain and no sites with attachment loss >2.5 mm, I year post-ther
apy. Periodontally healthy subjects exhibited no pecker or attachment
level >3 mm, and no evidence of progressing attachment loss during I y
ear of monitoring. Baseline serum was obtained from each subject and r
ested against 85 subgingival species, including reference strains and
strains isolated from refractory subjects, using checkerboard immunobl
otting. Significance of differences in levels of serum antibody among
groups were sought using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Refractory subjects
constituted a heterogeneous group based on their serum antibody respon
se to subgingival species. Some individuals had antibody reactions to
many subgingival species, while other subjects showed fewer or low num
bers of responses. On average, refractory subjects exhibited higher nu
mbers and levels of serum antibody reactions to a wide range of subgin
gival species than successfully treated or periodontally healthy subje
cts. Differences in serum antibody among clinical groups were more str
iking at higher threshold levels of antibody (>50 mu g/ml and >100 mu
g/ml). The data showed that a subject was 10.1x more likely to be refr
actory if the subject exhibited antibody reactions with >9 subgingival
species at >50 mu g/ml (p<0.001, after adjusting for multiple compari
sons). Serum antibody to a subset of the test species differed among t
he clinical groups. Porphypromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus,
and some strains isolated from refractory subjects (a novel Neisseria
sp., Enterococcus faecalis, Prevotella loescheii and Prevotella oulora
) elicited high serum antibody in the successfully treated and refract
ory subjects. High levels of serum antibody to a Microbacterium lactic
um-like organism, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus constellatus, Ac
tinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotype c and Haemophilus aphrophi
lus significantly increased the likelihood of a subject being refracto
ry to conventional periodontal therapy.