Ta. Gardner et al., MICROFOCAL PROSTATE-CANCER - BIOPSY CANCER VOLUME DOES NOT PREDICT ACTUAL TUMOR VOLUME, British Journal of Urology, 81(6), 1998, pp. 839-843
Objective To determine whether microfocal prostate cancer on needle bi
opsy predicts clinically insignificant disease in men undergoing radic
al prostatectomy. Patients and methods The records of 726 men who unde
rwent radical prostatectomy between January 1990 and September 1995 we
re reviewed; 83 men had pre-operative prostatic needle biopsies which
revealed microfocal prostate cancer. In these men, tumour volume (leng
th) in the biopsy was compared to the percentage of tumour in the tota
l prostatectomy specimen, and the pathological stage and clinical outc
ome reviewed. Results Of the 83 men with microfocal prostate cancer on
biopsy 75 (90%) had clinically significant disease. Pre-operative var
iables were of no use in identifying patients with clinically insignif
icant tumour volumes. When comparing those with microfocal tumour and
those without at one institution, 69% had organ-confined (pT2) disease
and 31% had capsular penetration (pT3), compared with 61% and 39%, re
spectively (P<0.05). Additionally, the positive surgical margin rate f
or those with microfocal tumour was only 6%, compared with 26% for tho
se without microfocal disease (P<0.05). Biochemical failures during th
e median follow-up period of 24 months occurred in 6% of the men with
microfocal cancer and in 15% of those undergoing total prostatectomy (
P<0.05). Conclusions Microfocal prostate cancer determined from the ne
edle biopsy does not predict clinically insignificant disease.