A questionnaire was sent by mail to 4400 radiologists (i.e. to at leas
t 1000 radiological institutions). The response rate was about 5%. The
results showed that 47% of respondents felt well informed about teler
adiology, 49% not enough and 3% not at all. Image and report transfer
as well as interfaces to reference databases, educational applications
, technical quality surveillance and product support (maintenance) wer
e considered to be increasingly important areas. Smaller institutions
(1-3 doctors) judged expert consultation as more important than bigger
institutions. Standardization, system stability and data security wer
e demanded as well as guidelines, for example concerning the linking o
f report and image, correct documentation and required image quality.
Technically most demands can be fulfilled today but this technology is
not yet commonly included in teleradiology systems.