ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF PRECORDIAL PERCUSSION AND PALPATION FOR DETECTING INCREASED LEFT-VENTRICULAR END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AND MASS - A COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL FINDINGS AND ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HEART
Ps. Heckerling et al., ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF PRECORDIAL PERCUSSION AND PALPATION FOR DETECTING INCREASED LEFT-VENTRICULAR END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AND MASS - A COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL FINDINGS AND ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HEART, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 270(16), 1993, pp. 1943-1948
Objective.-To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of indirect defi
nitive precordial percussion in detecting increased left ventricular e
nd-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular mass (LVM), and left ven
tricular end-diastolic wall thickness ( LVEDWT), and to compare it wit
h palpation of the apical impulse. Design.-Descriptive study. Setting.
-Hospitals and clinics of a university medical center. Patients.-Conve
nience sample of 103 patients (62 men and 41 women) referred for ultra
fast computed tomography (CT) of the heart. Interventions.-Percussion
dullness distance from the midsternal line in the left fourth through
sixth intercostal spaces, distance of the apical impulse from the mid-
sternal line, and apical impulse diameter in the left lateral decubitu
s position were measured on all patients. Measurements of LVEDV, LVM,
and LVEDWT were taken using ultrafast CT of the heart. Investigators p
erforming the physical diagnostic maneuvers were blinded to the clinic
al history and CT results, and investigators performing the CT scans w
ere blinded to physical findings. Results.-Percussion dullness distanc
e in the left fifth intercostal space was the best discriminator of LV
EDV (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area, 0.680; 95% confiden
ce interval [CI], 0.547 to 0.813), and dullness distance in the left s
ixth intercostal space was the best discriminator of LVM and LVEDWT (R
OC areas, 0.831, 95% CI, 0.674 to 0.988; and 0.849, 95% CI, 0.651 to 0
.999, respectively). A percussion dullness distance of greater than 10
.5 cm in the left fifth intercostal space detected increased LVEDV or
LVM with a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% CI, 70.5% to 98.5%) and a specifi
city of 30.3% (95% CI, 19.9% to 43.0%). There was moderate concordance
between investigators for percussion dullness distance (kappa, 0.57;
95% CI, 0.18 to 0.96). In patients in whom an impulse was palpated, an
apical impulse diameter of greater than 3.0 cm in the left lateral de
cubitus detected increased LVEDV or LVM with a sensitivity of 100% (95
% CI, 77.1% to 100%) and a specificity of 40% (95% CI, 23.2% to 59.3%)
. However, an impulse was palpable in only 53% of cases and showed onl
y slight interobserver reproducibility (kappa, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.
58). Conclusion.-Indirect definitive percussion of the precordium is a
sensitive and moderately reproducible maneuver for excluding cardiome
galy due to increased LVEDV or LVM. Although measurement of apical imp
ulse diameter was also sensitive in excluding cardiomegaly, lack of a
palpable impulse in many patients and low precision between physicians
may limit its utility in clinical practice.