A. Choppin et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS IN RABBIT ISOLATED IRIS SPHINCTER MUSCLE AND URINARY-BLADDER SMOOTH-MUSCLE, British Journal of Pharmacology, 124(5), 1998, pp. 883-888
1 The pharmacological characteristics of muscarinic receptors in the r
abbit iris sphincter muscle were studied and compared to Mg receptors
in rabbit urinary bladder smooth muscle. 2 (+)-Cis-dioxolane induced c
oncentration-dependent contractions of the iris sphincter muscle (pEC(
50) = 6.41 +/- 0.10, E-max = 181 +/- 17 mg, n = 38) and urinary bladde
r smooth muscle (pEC(50) = 6.97 +/- 0.04, E-max = 4.28 +/- 0.25 g, n =
54). These contractions were competitively antagonized by a range of
muscarinic receptor antagonists (pK(B) values are given for the iris s
phincter muscle and the bladder smooth muscle, respectively): atropine
(9.30 +/- 0.07 and 9.40 +/- 0.04), AQ-RA 741 (6.35 +/- 0.04 and 6.88
+/- 0.03), darifenacin (9.56 +/- 0.05 and 9.12 +/- 0.05), methoctramin
e (5.75 +/- 0.07 and 5.81 +/- 0.06), oxybutynin (8.10 +/- 0.09 and 8.5
9 +/- 0.06), pirenzepine (6.79 +/- 0.05 and 6.89 +/- 0.04), secoverine
(7.54 +/- 0.05 and 7.66 +/- 0.05), p-F-HHSiD (7.55 +/- 0.09 and 7.50
+/- 0.05) and zamifenacin (8.69 +/- 0.10 and 8.36 +/- 0.06). A signifi
cant correlation between the pK(B) values in the bladder and the pK(B)
values in the iris was obtained. 3 In both tissues, the pK(B) values
correlated most favorably with pK(i) values for these compounds at hum
an recombinant muscarinic m3 receptors. A reasonable correlation was a
lso noted at human recombinant muscarinic m5 receptors given the poor
discriminative ability of ligands between m3 and m5 receptors. 4 Overa
ll, the data from this study suggest that the muscarinic receptors med
iating contraction of the rabbit iris sphincter muscle and urinary bla
dder smooth muscle are similar and equate most closely with the pharma
cologically-defined muscarinic M3 receptor.