MELATONIN RECEPTOR PHARMACOLOGY - TOWARD SUBTYPE SPECIFICITY

Citation
D. Sugden et al., MELATONIN RECEPTOR PHARMACOLOGY - TOWARD SUBTYPE SPECIFICITY, Biology of the cell, 89(8), 1997, pp. 531-537
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cell Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02484900
Volume
89
Issue
8
Year of publication
1997
Pages
531 - 537
Database
ISI
SICI code
0248-4900(1997)89:8<531:MRP-TS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The recent cloning of three distinct melatonin receptor subtypes (Mel( 1a), Mel(1b) and Mel(1c)) which are part of a new family of G-protein coupled receptors, and probably mediate the physiological actions of t he hormone, has spurred interest in the design of analogues with subty pe selectivity. The 5-methoxyl and N-acetyl groups of melatonin are im portant for binding to and activation of the receptor. The indole nucl eus serves to hold these two groups at the correct distance from one a nother and allows them to adopt the required orientation for interacti on with the receptor binding pocket. We have investigated the subtype selectivity of a number of analogues of melatonin in which the structu re has systematically been modified in order to probe the similarities and differences in the interaction of ligand and receptor subtype. At all three subtypes 5-methoxyl and N-acetyl groups of melatonin are im portant for high affinity binding. However, replacing the 5-methoxyl g roup (eg with 5-H, 5-OH, 5-Me or 5-BzO) reduces affinity much less at the Mel(1b) receptor subtype than at either Mel(1a) or Mel(1c) cloned subtypes.This suggests differences between the Mel(1b) and Mel(1a/1c) subtypes in the size and shape of the binding pocket or in the manner in which melatonin interacts with the receptor at this position. Furth er studies have revealed that analogues with longer N-acyl carbon chai ns behave similarly at each subtype. These observations suggest that t he 'pocket' into which the N-acetyl group fits is very similar for eac h subtype. Substitutions at the 2-position on the indole ring improved affinity at each receptor subtype but did not give selective analogue s. The systematic 'mapping' of the requirements for binding at each re ceptor subtype should allow the design of more selective agonists and antagonists, which will be valuable tools for the characterization and classification of functional melatonin receptors. ((C) Elsevier, Pari s).