Mn. Gourevitch et al., COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECTLY OBSERVED CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS OF TUBERCULOSIS AMONG DRUG-USERS AT HIGH-RISK FOR TUBERCULOSIS, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease, 2(7), 1998, pp. 531-540
SETTING: A methadone treatment program with on-site medical care in th
e Bronx, New York. OBJECTIVE: To define whether costs associated with
directly observed preventive therapy (DOPT) of tuberculosis are justif
ied by cases and costs of tuberculosis prevented among persons at high
risk for active disease. DESIGN: Detailed data were collected on drug
users in treatment regarding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and t
uberculosis infection and disease, and costs of screening, chemoprophy
laxis, direct observation and treatment of active disease. The cost-ef
fectiveness of providing DOPT to this population was modeled. RESULTS:
We assessed the impact of providing DOPT to 151 eligible persons. Ass
uming 65% isoniazid effectiveness, and incorporating costs of screenin
g, observed chemoprophylaxis and clinical monitoring, a net savings in
tuberculosis-related hospital costs of $285 284 ($563 per person scre
ened) was associated with DOPT ($10 274 per case prevented). Direct ob
servation of chemoprophylaxis proved cost-effective if associated with
even a 10% increment in overall isoniazid effectiveness compared with
self-administered chemoprophylaxis. DOPT costs per tuberculosis case
averted remained below the in-patient costs of a single case of drug-s
ensitive disease across a range of parameter values. CONCLUSIONS: Prov
iding DOPT is a highly cost-effective intervention for drug users in t
reatment. Commitment of additional resources required for DOPT should
be given priority in this and other populations at high risk for tuber
culosis.