T. Ogawa et al., DIFFERENCE IN THE MECHANISM OF BALANCING-SIDE DISCLUSION BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND MOLARS, Journal of oral rehabilitation, 25(6), 1998, pp. 430-435
This study investigates the cusp angle and movement variables related
to balancing-side disclusion and compares the characteristics between
the Ist and 2nd molar regions. Fifty-six normal young adults were divi
ded into two groups according to balancing-side contact: a disclusion
group consisting of 40 subjects (80 excursions), and a non-disclusion
group consisting of 16 subjects (20 excursions). Lateral excursions we
re measured in six-degrees of freedom, and the inclinations of the fro
ntal paths were calculated on the working-side canine, balancing-side
Ist and 2nd molars and balancing-side condylar point. The cusp angle w
as measured using a three-dimensional digitizer. While there were no d
ifferences between disclusion and nondisclusion groups in the inclinat
ion of the balancing-side condylar path, significant differences were
found in the cusp angle and the inclination of the working-side canine
path. In the non-disclusion group, the cusp angle of the 2nd molar wa
s markedly greater than that of the Ist molar. It was concluded that t
he inclination of the anterior guidance and the cusp angle of related
teeth have a great effect on the occurrence of balancing-side disclusi
on and that the mechanism of high frequent balancing-side contacts at
the 2nd molar was characterized by its greater cusp angle compared to
the Ist molar.