Background and Objectives. Although dizziness and drowsiness may be pr
oduced with either intravenous or epidural fentanyl, their occurrence
after an intravenous injection is more rapid and relatively more prono
unced. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not the d
ifference between routes of administration would be a reliable method
of detecting an accidental intravascular injection. Methods. In part 1
, using a double-blinded protocol, we prospectively assessed in labori
ng women the incidence of dizziness, drowsiness, or both associated wi
th intravenous fentanyl (100 mug). In random order, subjects received
two peripheral intravenous injections: 2 ml of fentanyl and 2 ml of sa
line, separated by a 3-minute observation period. Results. In group 1
(18/18) and group 2 (22/22), all subjects reported a response to intra
venous fentanyl within the one-minute assessment. In part 2, we evalua
ted in laboring patients the frequency of dizziness, drowsiness, or bo
th to epidural fentanyl (100 mug). The study design was identical to p
art 1; however, the subjects received 2 ml of fentanyl and 2 ml of sal
ine via a functional epidural catheter. In group 3 (1/18) and group 4
(1/22), one subject reported a response to epidural fentanyl within th
e 3-minute observation period. Conclusions. Overall, the responses to
intravenous fentanyl (40/40) occurred in a remarkably more consistent
fashion when compared to epidural fentanyl (2/40). Thus, the results s
uggest that in laboring patients, intravenous fentanyl produces predic
table and easily detectable changes that may be useful in identifying
an epidural catheter unintentionally placed intravascularly.