Rn. Carney et Jr. Levin, DO MNEMONIC MEMORIES FADE AS TIME GOES BY - HERES LOOKING ANEW, Contemporary educational psychology (Print), 23(3), 1998, pp. 276-297
Recent research has suggested that information acquired through the mn
emonic keyword method fades rapidly as time goes by-especially in the
absence of an immediate test. Five experiments were conducted to inves
tigate various aspects of this issue and our results turned up the ''u
sual suspects.'' That is, we found consistent mnemonic advantages in a
cquisition tall experiments) as well as delayed mnemonic advantages in
cases where students received an immediate test on studied items (Exp
eriments 2, 3, 4, and 5). Further, and of special interest here, even
in the absence of an immediate test, we found delayed mnemonic advanta
ges (Experiments 3, 4, and 5). Nevertheless, these positive delayed fi
ndings were tempered by the observation that, in terms of absolute num
ber retained, there was a somewhat faster forgetting rate for mnemonic
students in comparison to repetition controls. In our discussion, we
examine other delayed-recall indicators (relative differences and cond
itional probabilities) in an effort to better compare the ''forgetting
'' of mnemonic and repetition participants. A theoretical explanation
for the fragility of mnemonic memories, and implications for future re
search, are provided. (C) 1998 Academic Press.