Ja. Schinka et al., COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES AND COSTS OF INPATIENT CARE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR SUBSTANCE-DEPENDENT VETERANS, Psychiatric services, 49(7), 1998, pp. 946-950
Objective: This study examined the differential effectiveness and cost
s of three weeks of treatment for patients with moderately severe subs
tance dependence assigned to inpatient treatment or to a supportive ho
using setting. Supportive housing is temporary housing that allows a p
atient to participate in an intensive hospital-based treatment program
. Type and intensity of treatment were generally equivalent for the tw
o groups. Methods: Patients were consecutive voluntary admissions to t
he substance abuse treatment program of a large metropolitan Veterans
Affairs medical center, Patients with serious medical conditions or hi
ghly unstable psychiatric disorders were excluded. Patients in support
ive housing attended the inpatient program on weekdays from 7:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. They were assessed at baseline and at two-month follow-up. R
esults: Baseline analyses of clinical, personality, and demographic ch
aracteristics revealed no substantive differences between the 62 patie
nts assigned to inpatient treatment and the 36 assigned to supportive
housing. The degree of treatment involvement and dropout rates did not
differ between groups. Of the 55 inpatients completing treatment, 29
were known to be abstinent at follow-up, and of the 35 supportive hous
ing patients completing treatment, 22 were abstinent, The proportion w
as similar for both groups, about 70 percent. The cost of a successful
treatment for the inpatient group was $9,524. For the supportive hous
ing group, it was $4,291, Conclusions: Given the absence of differenti
al treatment effects between inpatient and supportive housing settings
, the use of supportive housing alternatives appears to provide an opp
ortunity for substantial cost savings for VA patients with substance d
ependence disorders.