IMPACT OF ANTIRETROVIRAL COMBINATION THERAPIES ON AIDS SURVEILLANCE REPORTS IN SWITZERLAND

Citation
M. Gebhardt et al., IMPACT OF ANTIRETROVIRAL COMBINATION THERAPIES ON AIDS SURVEILLANCE REPORTS IN SWITZERLAND, AIDS, 12(10), 1998, pp. 1195-1201
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,"Infectious Diseases",Virology
Journal title
AIDSACNP
ISSN journal
02699370
Volume
12
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1195 - 1201
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9370(1998)12:10<1195:IOACTO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background: AIDS reporting in Switzerland is mandatory by law. For the first time since the beginning of the epidemic, health authorities ob served a decline in AIDS surveillance reports, from 545 new cases in 1 995 to 459 in 1996, a decrease of 86 cases. Objective: To examine the extent to which this decline in AIDS surveillance reports is attributa ble to the introduction of antiretroviral combination therapy. Patient s and setting: Swiss HIV Cohort Study, a multicentre cohort of adult H IV-infected patients with national overage. Participants at risk of de veloping a first AIDS-defining event, defined as persons with a CD4 ce ll count below 200 x 10(6)/l or in clinical stage B, were studied. Met hods: A parametric statistical survival model was used to estimate the number of AIDS cases expected in the absence of combination therapies . Taking reporting delays into account, the effect of the introduction of combination therapies in the cohort on national AIDS reports was e stimated from the difference between the number of expected and observ ed cases. Results: A total of 4915 participants contributed 10 755 per son-years and 2366 initial AIDS events. Between 1990 and 1994, about 3 5% received antiretroviral therapy, predominantly monotherapy. In 1995 and 1996, the prevalence of antiretroviral therapy increased steadily due to the introduction of dual and triple combinations. The mid-year prevalence of use of combination therapies was 6% in 1994, 13% in 199 5, and 48% in 1996. The difference between expected and observed cases per half-year increased from 12 in the first 6 months of 1994 to 69 i n the second half of 2996. Taking reporting delays into account, we es timated that 43 (95% confidence interval, 17-69) of the deficit of 86 reports could be attributed to combination therapies. Conclusion: The introduction of antiretroviral combination therapies in a single cohor t study explained 50% of the decline in national AIDS surveillance rep orts. Monitoring the use and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy m ust become an important component of AIDS surveillance systems. (C) 19 98 Lippincott-Raven Publishers.