DIRECT COMPARISONS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY, CHEMOTHERAPY, AND CHEMOENDOCRINE THERAPY FOR OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR AND MENOPAUSAL STATUS
Y. Nomura et al., DIRECT COMPARISONS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY, CHEMOTHERAPY, AND CHEMOENDOCRINE THERAPY FOR OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR AND MENOPAUSAL STATUS, Breast cancer research and treatment, 49(1), 1998, pp. 51-60
Based on estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal status, operable breast
cancer (UICC stage I, II, III-a) patients were randomized for adjuvan
t endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and chemoendocrine therapy, and the
effects on the relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival(OS) w
ere compared. Tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg/day was administered orally for 2
years after mastectomy as an adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopau
sal patients. In premenopausal patients, oophorectomy (OVEX) was perfo
rmed before TAM administration. In the chemotherapy arm (CHEM), patien
ts were given 0.06 mg/kg of body weight of mitomycin C (MMC) intraveno
usly, followed by an oral administration of cyclophosphamide (CPA) 100
mg/day in an administration of a 3-month period and a 3-month intermi
ssion. This 6-month schedule was repeated 4 times in 2 years. The chem
oendocrine arm (CHEM + TAM) was composed of TAM with MMC + CPA chemoth
erapy. The patients were randomized according to ER and menopausal sta
tus. ER-positive patients were randomized to three arms: OVEX +/- TAM,
CHEM, and CHEM + TAM. For ER-negative patients there were two arms: C
HEM and CHEM + TAM. 1579 patients entered the trial between September
1978 and December 1991, with median follow-up of 8.2 years. In ER-posi
tive, premenopausal patients, there were no significant differences in
RFS or OS among OVEX + TAM, MMC + CPA, TAM + MMC + CPA arms. On the c
ontrary, in ER-positive, postmenopausal patients, the chemoendocrine t
herapy showed a significantly higher RFS (p = 0.0400) and OS (p = 0.01
87) as compared with TAM to chemotherapy alone. There were no signific
ant differences in RFS or OS by addition of TAM on the chemotherapy, i
n both pre- and post-menopausal ER-negative patients. It was concluded
that in ER-positive premenopausal breast cancer, endocrine therapy al
one may be equivalent in prolonging RFS and OS to chemotherapy or chem
oendocrine therapy, and that ER-positive postmenopausal breast cancer
may be better controlled with the combination of TAM and chemotherapy,
as compared to TAM or chemotherapy alone. The importance of stratific
ation of operable breast cancer by ER and menopausal status, as well a
s the direct comparisons of different treatments, were stressed.