SELECTIVE-INHIBITION OF THE CUTANEOUS LATE BUT NOT IMMEDIATE ALLERGICRESPONSE TO ANTIGENS BY MISOPROSTOL, A PGE ANALOG - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED STUDY
R. Alam et al., SELECTIVE-INHIBITION OF THE CUTANEOUS LATE BUT NOT IMMEDIATE ALLERGICRESPONSE TO ANTIGENS BY MISOPROSTOL, A PGE ANALOG - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED STUDY, The American review of respiratory disease, 148(4), 1993, pp. 1066-1070
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of misoprost
ol on allergen-induced cutaneous immediate- and late-phase allergic re
actions in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study. We also
studied the mechanism of antiallergic effects of misoprostol. A total
of 16 dust mite-allergic patients received misoprostol (200 mug) or p
lacebo and then had skin testing on 2 different days. The immediate- a
nd late-phase skin response was monitored for 6 h. Skin biopsy was obt
ained from 5 selected donors at 5 h. In vitro studies included the eff
ect of misoprostol on eosinophil chemotaxis, eosinophil survival, baso
phil histamine release, and cytokine production by lymphocytes. All su
bjects developed an immediate wheal reaction and a late-phase indurati
on in response to dust mite allergens after taking placebo. Misoprosto
l selectively inhibited the late- but not the immediate-phase response
(p < 0.05). Histologic studies revealed a trend toward a reduced numb
er of inflammatory cells in the skin dermis after misoprostol treatmen
t. Misoprostol significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited eosinophil chemotaxi
s and the production of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating fact
or by lymphocytes at concentrations greater-than-or-equal-to 10(-8) M.
However, at significantly lower concentrations (greater-than-or-equal
-to 10(-12) M) misoprostol blocked cytokine-stimulated eosinophil surv
ival. Thus, misoprostol has potent antiallergic effects and blocks the
cutaneous late-phase allergic inflammation.