TELEMETRY OUTSIDE CRITICAL CARE UNITS - PATTERNS OF UTILIZATION AND INFLUENCE ON MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

Background: Guidelines for the use of telemetry in hospitalized patien ts have been proposed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). How ever, there have been only a few studies which have investigated the u sefulness of these guidelines in clinical practice. Hypothesis: This s tudy assessed the role of telemetry in the decision making process out side the critical care units. Methods: The observational study, lastin g 4 weeks, was conducted in the telemetry unit of a tertiary care teac hing hospital and included 61 male patients (age range 40-61 years). T hey had been directly admitted to the telemetry unit or transferred fr om a critical care unit and were followed for as long as telemetry was active. Indication for telemetry and the contribution of telemetry to management decisions were assessed by a physician not involved in the care of the patient. Results: Cumulative number of telemetry days was 379 with a mean of 6.2 days per patient. Total number of telemetry ev ents was 297. According to the ACC classification, 14 patients (22.9%) had class I indication, 21 patients (34.4%) had class II indication, and 26 patients (42.6%) had class III indication. Telemetry events wer e seen in 18.2% of class I patients, in 39.7% of class II patients, an d in 42.1% of class III patients. Only 12 telemetry events (4%) result ed in patient management, with none belonging to class III. Conclusion : Telemetry findings in patients outside the critical care units are n ot usually responsible for major therapeutic changes. The value of tel emetry in such patients may be overrated.