Pb. Watts et Km. Drobish, PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO SIMULATED ROCK CLIMBING AT DIFFERENT ANGLES, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 30(7), 1998, pp. 1118-1122
Purpose: Although rock climbing has increased in popularity as a recre
ational activity and competitive sport, few studies have assessed the
physiological demands of the activity. To describe the physiological r
esponses to rock climbing at different angles, Methods: Sixteen experi
enced climbers (age = 26 +/- 8 yr) attempted intermittent climbing bou
ts at different angles on a special rock climbing treadmill (Brewer's
Ledge Treadwall (TM)). Heart rate (HR) was monitored continuously, and
(V) over dot O-2 was determined at 20-s intervals during each climbin
g bout. Immediately after each bout, the subject provided a rating of
perceived exertion (RPE), and an average of right and left handgrip fo
rce (HG) was obtained. Blood was collected via fingerprick after each
bout and analyzed for lactate (BL). On a separate day, each subject co
mpleted a steady-state treadmill running bout at a HR equal to that ob
tained at an 86 degrees angle during the climbing test. This test was
followed by a progression to exhaustion to determine peak HR and (V) o
ver dot O-2, responses. Results: While HR increased with climbing angl
e, (V) over dot O-2, did not significantly vary. BL began to significa
ntly increase as the angle exceeded vertical(91 degrees) and continued
to increase with successive angles. HG decreased with increasing angl
e and was negatively correlated with BL (r = -0.96). Scores for RPE in
creased with steeper angles. The comparison of steady-state work at th
e same HR for climbing versus treadmill running revealed a higher (V)
over dot O-2, during running with no differences in BL and RPE. Conclu
sions: Based upon these results, it was concluded that continuous rock
climbing over terrain steepness of 80 degrees to 101 degrees presents
a ''very heavy'' work challenge, averaging 8.4-9.0 metabolic equivale
nts, regardless of angle. Despite similar RPE and BL, the relative exe
rcise intensity elicited from simulated rock climbing is lower than th
at of running at the same HR.