Je. Max et al., PEDIATRIC TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND BURN PATIENTS IN THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM - THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF PSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMATOLOGY, journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the law, 26(2), 1998, pp. 247-258
The goal of this research was to conduct an assessment of psychopathol
ogy in plaintiffs following pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and
burns and its relationship to awards of total compensatory damages. C
hildhood TBI (n = 43) and burn (n = 51) plaintiffs were ascertained th
rough a survey of the U.S. civil justice system involving a review of
judicial opinions and verdict reporters in cases that had resulted in
an award of compensatory damages in all states from 1978 to 1988. Narr
ative summaries, drawn from these sources with supplemental informatio
n from counsel of record, where possible, were prepared. Psychiatric a
nd disability ratings were made from the summaries, blind to award dat
a. Outcome measures were the pattern and prevalence of psychiatric dis
orders and their correlation with the awards. It was found that psychi
atric disorders, which were almost exclusively internalizing disorders
(e.g., anxiety), were present in approximately 25 percent of the subj
ects in each group. Psychiatric symptoms were not related to the award
amount. Significantly greater awards in the TBI group were accounted
for by greater disability measures. Physical disability and total disa
bility (including physical and quality of life limitations) were signi
ficantly and independently correlated with the award. It is concluded
that the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in childhood TBI and burn
plaintiffs is similar to that found in TBI and burn subjects in clini
cal studies. Distribution of disorders is atypical in that externalizi
ng disorders (e.g., attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) were not
commonly reported for either class of injuries. Awards are strongly c
orrelated with disability variables reflecting mainly the severity of
physical injury. Internalizing psychopathology may be underappreciated
in decisions involving magnitude of awards following selected childho
od injuries.