S. Siegrist et al., DOES ORGANIC AGRICULTURE REDUCE SOIL ERODIBILITY - THE RESULTS OF A LONG-TERM FIELD-STUDY ON LOESS IN SWITZERLAND, Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 69(3), 1998, pp. 253-264
In a long-term field trial in northwestern Switzerland, the effects of
organic and conventional land-use management on earthworm populations
and on soil erodibility were investigated. A silt loam soil which had
developed in deep deposits of alluvial loess characterised the study
site. Three methods were applied to analyse soil erodibility, at three
different periods between autumn 1992 and 1993: aggregate stability (
measured in the laboratory by a high energy rainfall simulation and by
percolation) and soil particle detachment (measured in the field by s
plash erosion). Earthworm biomass and density, as well as the populati
on diversity, were significantly greater on the organic plots than on
the conventional plots. Likewise, the aggregate stability of the organ
ic plots, when determined by means of percolation, was significantly b
etter. Therefore, erosion susceptibility is greater on plots farmed co
nventionally. On the other hand, splash erosion monitoring and simulat
ed rainfall experiments only partially highlight differences in erodib
ility between the two main land-management methods. Future comparisons
between the farming systems should also include farmer managed fields
with greater differentiation in crop rotations and cultural practices
like tillage, fertilisation and pesticide use. (C) 1998 Elsevier Scie
nce B.V. All rights reserved.