Wl. Hicks et al., SURGERY VERSUS RADIATION-THERAPY AS SINGLE-MODALITY TREATMENT OF TONSILLAR FOSSA CARCINOMA - THE ROSWELL-PARK-CANCER-INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE (1971-1991), The Laryngoscope, 108(7), 1998, pp. 1014-1019
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology,"Medicine, Research & Experimental
Objective: To compare the efficacy and treatment outcomes in patients
with tonsillar fossa cancer using surgery or radiation as a single mod
ality therapy Methods: From 1971 to 1991 239 patients with Oral pharyn
geal cancer were treated at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Of these pa
tients 90 had tonsillar carcinoma. Seventy-six of these patients recei
ved either surgery (SA) (n = 56) or radiation therapy (RA) (n = 20) as
single-modality therapy and are the subject of this review All patien
ts in the radiation arm of this review were surgical candidates who de
clined primary surgical therapy. Results: Sixty-three percent of the S
A and 80% of the RA treatment groups presented with either stage III o
r stage IV disease (P less than or equal to .05). Forty-seven percent
of the SA group and 52% of the RA patients had clinically positive reg
ional disease at initial presentation. There was a predictable pattern
of nodal presentation, with level II the most frequently involved reg
ion. The rate of occult metastasis was 27% and was evenly distributed
between T1 and T4 disease. The overall local control rate in the SA gr
oup was 75%, compared with 60% in the RA group (P value was not signif
icant). The disease-specific survival (all stages) was 61% in the SA g
roup and 37% in the RA group (P less than or equal to .05). The diseas
e-free survival for stage III and stage IV disease in the SA group was
47% and in the RA group 27% (P less than or equal to .05). Survival m
easured against clinical response to radiation therapy, in complete re
sponders (all stages) was 83%; by contrast there were no survivors pas
t 24 months in the partial response group (P less than or equal to .00
1). Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that for early dis
ease (stage I/II), surgery or radiation therapy as single-modality tre
atment is equally effective. For advanced disease radiation therapy is
inferior to surgery as a single-modality treatment, as measured by ul
timate survival and the local control of disease. There is, how ever,
a subset of patients with advanced disease who respond to radiation th
erapy and whose survival is equivalent to our surgical cohort of patie
nts.