Mc. Beduschi et Je. Oesterling, TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION OF THE PROSTATE - A MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT FOR SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 73(7), 1998, pp. 696-701
Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate, a relatively new minima
lly invasive treatment modality for patients with bladder outlet obstr
uction attributable to an enlarged prostate gland, has undergone exten
sive evaluation by numerous investigators worldwide. The results to da
te indicate that needle ablation is safe and effective for relieving s
ymptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the effect
has been demonstrated to be durable for at least 2 years. Nevertheless
, additional investigations with longer follow-up data are needed to a
ddress the important issues of extended durability (5 to 10 years) and
biophysiologic mechanism of action. Comparisons between transurethral
needle ablation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the pr
ostate (TURP) have revealed that the subjective and objective measures
of response are comparable, although TURF has consistently displayed
a slight advantage over needle ablation for most variables analyzed, e
xcept quality of life store. The advantages of needle ablation over TU
RF are (1) performance in the office as an outpatient procedure, (2) n
o need for general or spinal anesthesia, (3) rapid recovery, (4) minim
al side effects, and (5) one-time intervention. The following disadvan
tages exist with needle ablation: (1) it may not be indicated or effec
tive in patients with large prostate glands (75 g or more); (2) no pro
state tissue is available for histologic evaluation; and (3) no long-t
erm efficacy or re-treatment rate data have been published. Overall, t
he available information indicates that transurethral needle ablation
is a viable minimally invasive treatment that may be applicable in men
with moderate to severe bladder outlet obstruction as a result of an
enlarged prostate gland.