N. Viltard et al., RETRIEVAL OF PRECIPITATION FROM MICROWAVE AIRBORNE SENSORS DURING TOGA COARE, Journal of applied meteorology, 37(7), 1998, pp. 701-717
The aim of this paper is to report on the retrieval of the vertically
averaged liquid cloud water content and vertically averaged precipitat
ion rates (rain and ice) from microwave airborne radiometric observati
ons in a two-plane parallel layer atmosphere. The approach is based on
the inversion of a simple radiative transfer model in which a raindro
p size distribution derived from microphysical measurements is introdu
ced. The microwave data (18.7, 21, 37, and 92 GHz) used were acquired
by the Airborne Multichannel Microwave Radiometer and Advanced Microwa
ve Moisture Sounder on board NP,SA DC8 within a mesoscale convective s
ystem on 6 February 1993 during the Tropical Oceans Global Atmosphere
Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment. Before interpreting the
results, the quality of the inversion is checked. The fit between the
measured and the model-retrieved brightness temperatures is good when
compared to the model and measurements uncertainties. Doppler radar da
ta from three other aircraft help the result's interpretation, providi
ng reflectivity and wind fields. The cloud liquid content seems to be
difficult to retrieve. The ice and liquid rain rates are consistent wi
th the other data sources: order of magnitude for convective and strat
iform regions, presence of ice and liquid precipitation correlated wit
h cell structure, and presence of cloud particles in the lighter preci
pitating regions. A quantitative comparison is done between the radiom
etric rainfall rates and those derived from the Airborne Rain Mapping
Radar observations (also on board NASA DC8). There is a good agreement
between the two from the statistical point of view (mean and standard
deviation values). Moreover, the finescale rain structures that appea
r in radar results are rather well reproduced in the radiometric resul
ts. The importance of the new drop size distribution introduced in the
radiative transfer model is emphasized by this last comparison.