Background-Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is based on pressu
re measurements. We have now sought to establish a Doppler-based conce
pt of relative flow velocity reserve (RFVR) for the functional assessm
ent of stenosis severity in epicardial coronary arteries. A clear thre
shold value to discriminate the functional severity of a coronary sten
osis does not exist for coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) based on
intracoronary Doppler measurements. In contrast, the concept of FFR, w
hich is based on intracoronary pressure measurements, has been extensi
vely validated. An FFR value below 0.75 reliably indicates a significa
nt stenosis. Methods and Results-RFVR is calculated as the ratio betwe
en distal CVR in the stenosed target vessel and distal CVR in a nonste
notic reference vessel. In 21 patients, RFVR was determined in 24 targ
et vessels by use of intracoronary adenosine and correlated to the FFR
, determined as the ratio of mean poststenotic to aortic pressures, in
the target vessel. Stenosis severity was classified according to quan
titative coronary angiography analysis. Reference diameter was 3.0+/-0
.4 mm (mean+/-SD), and area stenosis was 74+/-15% (range, 40% to 95%).
CVRs in the target and reference vessels were 2.1+/-0.5 and 2.6+/-0.7
, respectively. FFR ranged from 0.49 to 0.99 (mean, 0.81+/-0.15) and R
FVR from 0.53 to 1.0 (mean, 0.82+/-0.13). Poststenotic CVR did not cor
relate with either percent area stenosis (r=0.27, P=NS) or FFR (r=0.33
, P=NS). In contrast, FFR as well as RFVR showed a curvilinear relatio
n to percent area stenosis (r=0.89, P<0.0001 and r=0.79, P<0.0001, res
pectively). There was a close linear correlation between FFR and RFVR
(r=0.91, P<0.0001). Conclusions-RFVR correlates closely to FFR and to
percent area stenosis, whereas the correlation of CVR with FFR and per
cent area stenosis is rather poor. RFVR is a promising new concept for
assessment of coronary stenosis severity and clinical decision making
based on Doppler measurements.