IMPROVED ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY STENOSIS SEVERITY USING THE RELATIVE FLOW VELOCITY RESERVE

Citation
D. Baumgart et al., IMPROVED ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY STENOSIS SEVERITY USING THE RELATIVE FLOW VELOCITY RESERVE, Circulation, 98(1), 1998, pp. 40-46
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
00097322
Volume
98
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
40 - 46
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(1998)98:1<40:IAOCSS>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background-Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is based on pressu re measurements. We have now sought to establish a Doppler-based conce pt of relative flow velocity reserve (RFVR) for the functional assessm ent of stenosis severity in epicardial coronary arteries. A clear thre shold value to discriminate the functional severity of a coronary sten osis does not exist for coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) based on intracoronary Doppler measurements. In contrast, the concept of FFR, w hich is based on intracoronary pressure measurements, has been extensi vely validated. An FFR value below 0.75 reliably indicates a significa nt stenosis. Methods and Results-RFVR is calculated as the ratio betwe en distal CVR in the stenosed target vessel and distal CVR in a nonste notic reference vessel. In 21 patients, RFVR was determined in 24 targ et vessels by use of intracoronary adenosine and correlated to the FFR , determined as the ratio of mean poststenotic to aortic pressures, in the target vessel. Stenosis severity was classified according to quan titative coronary angiography analysis. Reference diameter was 3.0+/-0 .4 mm (mean+/-SD), and area stenosis was 74+/-15% (range, 40% to 95%). CVRs in the target and reference vessels were 2.1+/-0.5 and 2.6+/-0.7 , respectively. FFR ranged from 0.49 to 0.99 (mean, 0.81+/-0.15) and R FVR from 0.53 to 1.0 (mean, 0.82+/-0.13). Poststenotic CVR did not cor relate with either percent area stenosis (r=0.27, P=NS) or FFR (r=0.33 , P=NS). In contrast, FFR as well as RFVR showed a curvilinear relatio n to percent area stenosis (r=0.89, P<0.0001 and r=0.79, P<0.0001, res pectively). There was a close linear correlation between FFR and RFVR (r=0.91, P<0.0001). Conclusions-RFVR correlates closely to FFR and to percent area stenosis, whereas the correlation of CVR with FFR and per cent area stenosis is rather poor. RFVR is a promising new concept for assessment of coronary stenosis severity and clinical decision making based on Doppler measurements.